+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Anyone have or installed a Floscan?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Mira Mesa
    Posts
    453

    Default Anyone have or installed a Floscan?

    Just bought a Floscan 6520, older model, but still new in the box. Just looking for any comments on installing or operating.
    Glenn (Wizard)
    "The Reel One"
    26' Billfisher

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Spring Valley
    Posts
    2,692

    Default

    With all flow sensors it's important to install the sensor in a straight run of pipe. The rule of thumb is you need 10 pipe diameters in front of the sensor and 5 down stream.

    For example, if you were working with 1" pipe you need 10" of straight pipe before the sensor and 5" after the sensor. 3/8" pipe go with 3" in front and 1 1/2" after the sensor. The thought behind the straight run of pipe is to get the turbulence out of the fuel for a more accurate reading.

    One more installation tip: don't mount the sensor in the highest part of the fuel line. Any air in the system will get trapped at the high point and cause the reading to be erratic. This is a common mistake in the installation. Most of us mount stuff were it's easy to reach not were it will work the best.

    One more thing to check out: The part number on the box will read something like this 6520-CAT-20. That number would be a series 6500 gage for Caterpillar 3208 / 3406 / 3408 (up to 375 HP) 0-20 GPH.

    Every engine manufacture has a different supply vs return ratio. Flow scan's web site calls for a 6532-BOS-2K for the KAD42 and 43 engines.

    Mike
    Last edited by NoSlack; 12-08-2004 at 10:01 PM.
    NoSlack-------------------------------------------<'(((>{

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Mira Mesa
    Posts
    453

    Default

    Well I didn't buy it new, so no opportunity to get the exact recommend shiznit. This is a FloScan 6520 Bosch 2 kit. Diesel Analog guage with totalizer, input and return valves, decent hose extension input/output kits, and two pulsation dampeners. I guess I'm in for trial and error, or deinstall and resell. $300 used vs. about $700 new. I have a feeling it will be ok if I install in the right levels so there are no air bubbles.
    Glenn (Wizard)
    "The Reel One"
    26' Billfisher

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Spring Valley
    Posts
    2,692

    Default

    The difference between the 6520-BOS-2k that you have and the 6532-BOS-2k that Flow Scan recomends it the max GPH they will read (20 vs 32). The only time you might have a problem is when you are getting on it real hard and suck up some extra fuel.

    I think Charlie has the 10 GPH model and sees it peg out when he hits the upper RPMs but gets great accuracy on the low end. The 20 GPM model may work out just fine for your HP.

    Mike
    NoSlack-------------------------------------------<'(((>{

  5. #5

    Smile

    Good morning Glenn,

    I have the 6500 series FLOSCAN with 10GPH max reading which was installed at the shop. I was going to do it myself but as long as I was getting a repower I thought why not have them install the FLOSCAN too. I have been on at least three trips where I filled up completely and ran long distances then filled up again. I have never had better than about 8% accuracy thus far even after adjusting the switches to calibrate it. After talking to the guy at FLOSCAN he indicated that the AD-41 has a very low fuel consumption rate and it will be very difficult to get much more accuracy than that. I have set the switches to the recommended position in the manual and according to the FLOSCAN guy, I should be seeing at least 1/2 gallon per hour on the guage at idle. I still do not but, at least I do always have a good idea of how much fuel I am burning , have burned, and more importantly how much fuel I have remaining. I'm curious to know if Charlie is getting more accurate results. Charlie? Anyways, if you would be interested to look at how mine was installed you are welcome to stop by the house and check it out.

    Just e-mail me if interested.

    Scott

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    2,067

    Default

    Scott,

    Does yours peg out @ 10GPH running 80-100% throttle also?

    Could you tell us what are you readings @ 1800, 2100, 2700, 3000 ,3200, etc.

    Mike, I'm curious what your numbers are also at those RPMs

  7. #7

    Default

    Chris,

    Thanks for that feedback. That was exactly my concern. I was woried that at very slow speeds and at idle that my fuel was not going to be calculated accurately. Example if I let the boat warm up at the dock for 10 minutes at idle and then let the engine idle during a rock cod drift for 15 minutes several times during a trip then my accuracy will basically suck. My gauge indicates about 1/4 GPH at idle. I believe that in reality the ad-41 is really consuming at least 1 gallon per hour? Close enough I guess. I am still happy that I know I am within about 10 gallons of being empty (not that I would ever let it get that low on purpose). Even with the FLOSCAN i will always continue to plan any long trips with at least a 10% buffer for safety.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Vista, CA
    Posts
    581

    Default

    Sorry for the delayed response. My FloScan died last summer when Russ called me in on a paddy and I pegged it the needle. The needle stuck and died. I may replace it with a new one his summer.I calibrated the unit over time by adjusting the dip switches for the variance in actually fuel consumed vs the reading. The only problem was that if I ran with the needle pegged for any length of time I couldn't get an accurate reading. 10 GPH is not enough for the 41
    Charlie
    NOMAD

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts